Register

Login

Vet Times logo
+
  • View all news
  • Vets news
  • Vet Nursing news
  • Business news
  • + More
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
    • Crossword
  • View all clinical
  • Small animal
  • Livestock
  • Equine
  • Exotics
  • All Jobs
  • Your ideal job
  • Post a job
  • Career Advice
  • Students
About
Contact Us
For Advertisers
NewsClinicalJobs
Vet Times logo

Vets

All Vets newsSmall animalLivestockEquineExoticWork and well-beingOpinion

Vet Nursing

All Vet Nursing newsSmall animalLivestockEquineExoticWork and well-beingOpinion

Business

All Business newsHuman resourcesBig 6SustainabilityFinancePractice developmentsDigitalPractice profiles

+ More

VideosPodcastsDigital EditionCrossword

The latest veterinary news, delivered straight to your inbox.

Choose which topics you want to hear about and how often.

Vet Times logo 2

About

The team

Advertise with us

Recruitment

Contact us

Vet Times logo 2

Vets

All Vets news

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotic

Work and well-being

Opinion

Vet Nursing

All Vet Nursing news

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotic

Work and well-being

Opinion

Business

All Business news

Human resources

Big 6

Sustainability

Finance

Practice developments

Digital

Practice profiles

Clinical

All Clinical content

Small animal

Livestock

Equine

Exotics

Jobs

All Jobs content

All Jobs

Your ideal job

Post a job

Career Advice

Students

More

All More content

Videos

Podcasts

Digital Edition

Crossword


Terms and conditions

Complaints policy

Cookie policy

Privacy policy

fb-iconinsta-iconlinkedin-icontwitter-iconyoutube-icon

© Veterinary Business Development Ltd 2025

IPSO_regulated

18 Feb 2022

Essex vet struck off for clinical failures

“In the view of the committee, if [Anne Mullen] were permitted to remain on the register, there would be a serious risk of harm to animals” – Judith Way, chairman of the RCVS disciplinary committee.

author_img

Vet Times

Job Title



Essex vet struck off for clinical failures

The RCVS disciplinary committee has directed that a South Ockendon, Essex-based vet has her name removed from the register for a series of clinical failures and failing to respond to reasonable requests from the regulator.

The hearing for Anne Mullen, who had four charges against her, was held in her absence from 31 January to 7 February after she had indicated she would not be engaging with the disciplinary process.

Charges

The charges stated:

  • She had failed to provide adequate information to her clients regarding arrangements for her practice out-of-hours/emergency care in April and July 2019.
  • In relation to her spay surgery on a Labrador named Cleo on 19 July 2019: she had discharged Cleo when the dog was unfit to be discharged; discharged her with an inappropriate/inadequate abdominal dressing; and failed to provide adequate information to Cleo’s owners regarding complications from surgery, risk of postoperative haemorrhage and arrangements for out-of-hours care, as well as failing to make adequate clinical records.
  • In relation to surgery on a bulldog named Boycie on 15 October 2019: she had failed to obtain informed consent for anaesthesia/surgery from his owners; failed to ensure the dog had adequate monitoring while recovering from anaesthesia; failed to offer an adequate range of overnight care for the dog; left the dog alone overnight when he was not in a fit condition to be left; failed to provide information to his owners on postoperative care at home and OOH emergency arrangements; and failed to make adequate clinical records relating to his treatment.
  • She failed to have professional indemnity insurance (PII) or equivalent arrangements in place and/or failed to provide adequate details of it, failed to respond to requests regarding her CPD records, and failed to respond adequately to reasonable requests from the college for details and documents regarding her treatment of Cleo and Boycie.

Brain damage

In relation to the charges, the committee heard evidence from a number of witnesses, including the animals’ owners, an expert veterinary witness and college staff.

In the evidence , the committee heard Cleo had died while undergoing treatment at another veterinary practice from complications arising from blood loss following Mrs Mullen’s surgery on her. They also heard Boycie had suffered brain damage and had lost his sight due to postoperative hypoxia, although he had otherwise recovered.

Having heard all the evidence, the committee found all the charges against Mrs Mullen proven.

Aggravating factors

The committee then went on to consider whether the proven charges, individually and/or cumulatively, amounted to serious professional misconduct. In doing so, it considered the aggravating factors in this case, including that actual injury had occurred to animals, the misconduct was sustained and repeated over a period of time, the conduct directly contravened advice issued by the RCVS, and the blatant disregard of the RCVS’ regulatory role.

It also took into consideration that Mrs Mullen had previously been suspended from the register for a period of two months in April 2017 for failing to have PII arrangements in place.

Charges proven

It considered that no mitigating factors existed in the case and, accordingly, found serious professional misconduct in relation to all the proven charges.

The committee considered the conduct was so serious that the only means of protecting animal health and welfare, and public confidence in the profession was to direct the registrar to remove Mrs Mullen’s name from the register.

‘Reckless disregard’

Judith Way, chairing the committee and speaking on its behalf, said: “In the view of the committee, if [Mrs Mullen] were permitted to remain on the register, there would be a serious risk of harm to animals.

“She has demonstrated a reckless disregard for the obligations of a registered veterinary surgeon.”

Mrs Mullen has 28 days from being informed of the committee’s decision to lodge an appeal with the Privy Council.